User talk:MelonadeM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This talk section has been cleaned up I was using it as a scratchboard previously but No Longer. | |||
(i've also deleted my two posts bc they were just tests) | |||
== Is Roland D-50 appropriate for this wiki? == | |||
Hi. I just read what you wrote in [[Help:Creating Articles]]. Now I'm iffy if Roland D-50 would be an appropriate synth for this wiki? Roland D-50 is on the monotimbral side (like, no independent voices), but it still falls under ROMpler because of the ROM's samples, and the release era was close to Korg M1, too. [[User:FlashyRom|FlashyRom]] ([[User talk:FlashyRom|talk]]) 09:46, 13 July 2025 (UTC) | |||
:As the admin™, I am not MelonadeM, but if it's a ROMpler controlled by MIDI made in the 1980's or 1990's, I can tell you it's very unlikely it wouldn't be in scope for this wiki. [[User:hikari_no_yume|hikari_no_yume]] ([[User talk:hikari_no_yume|talk]]) 14:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC) | |||
::as the MelonadeM, i am not the admin™. the main reason for the guideline is i do want to avoid people starting to create articles on things like idk, the prophet-5, or a modern example the asm hydrasynth.. i think these are well-documented elsewhere, and are outside of the scope of both the wiki and our community (i think very few people would actually own either - this might be a good guideline, how likely are people to own or want to own such a thing). the d50 is valid for the wiki in my opinion as it would ultimately serve as a precursor to the jv, jd, xv and future synth models that Roland would make, and it also would end up in a direct derivative in the form of LA32 aka the MT32 and CM32L and D110 and so on. i think importantly though the help page is a guideline and not a hard rule book, i am thinking to revise it to make this more clear really but i hope this answers that at least [[User:MelonadeM|MelonadeM]] ([[User talk:MelonadeM|talk]]) 21:17, 15 July 2025 (UTC) | |||
- | |||
Latest revision as of 08:58, 18 July 2025
This talk section has been cleaned up I was using it as a scratchboard previously but No Longer.
(i've also deleted my two posts bc they were just tests)
Is Roland D-50 appropriate for this wiki?
Hi. I just read what you wrote in Help:Creating Articles. Now I'm iffy if Roland D-50 would be an appropriate synth for this wiki? Roland D-50 is on the monotimbral side (like, no independent voices), but it still falls under ROMpler because of the ROM's samples, and the release era was close to Korg M1, too. FlashyRom (talk) 09:46, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- As the admin™, I am not MelonadeM, but if it's a ROMpler controlled by MIDI made in the 1980's or 1990's, I can tell you it's very unlikely it wouldn't be in scope for this wiki. hikari_no_yume (talk) 14:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- as the MelonadeM, i am not the admin™. the main reason for the guideline is i do want to avoid people starting to create articles on things like idk, the prophet-5, or a modern example the asm hydrasynth.. i think these are well-documented elsewhere, and are outside of the scope of both the wiki and our community (i think very few people would actually own either - this might be a good guideline, how likely are people to own or want to own such a thing). the d50 is valid for the wiki in my opinion as it would ultimately serve as a precursor to the jv, jd, xv and future synth models that Roland would make, and it also would end up in a direct derivative in the form of LA32 aka the MT32 and CM32L and D110 and so on. i think importantly though the help page is a guideline and not a hard rule book, i am thinking to revise it to make this more clear really but i hope this answers that at least MelonadeM (talk) 21:17, 15 July 2025 (UTC)