User talk:MelonadeM

Type
Manufacturer
Release date
Standards
Parts
Max polyphony
Normal presets
Effects

melonadem on dtm wiki !

to do list:

- articles for the sc-88, sc-88 pro, sc-8850, yamaha mu128

- clean up the sc-55 article. include more sc55 and mk2 information. perhaps add related links to the sc-7 (or perhaps add the sc-7 into the sc-55 article as a general rspcm sound canvas article)

what is this

what do you mean add topic

OH that's what i tdoes

ok !

Is Roland D-50 appropriate for this wiki?

Hi. I just read what you wrote in Help:Creating Articles. Now I'm iffy if Roland D-50 would be an appropriate synth for this wiki? Roland D-50 is on the monotimbral side (like, no independent voices), but it still falls under ROMpler because of the ROM's samples, and the release era was close to Korg M1, too. FlashyRom (talk) 09:46, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

As the admin™, I am not MelonadeM, but if it's a ROMpler controlled by MIDI made in the 1980's or 1990's, I can tell you it's very unlikely it wouldn't be in scope for this wiki. hikari_no_yume (talk) 14:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

as the MelonadeM, i am not the admin™. the main reason for the guideline is i do want to avoid people starting to create articles on things like idk, the prophet-5, or a modern example the asm hydrasynth.. i think these are well-documented elsewhere, and are outside of the scope of both the wiki and our community (i think very few people would actually own either - this might be a good guideline, how likely are people to own or want to own such a thing). the d50 is valid for the wiki in my opinion as it would ultimately serve as a precursor to the jv, jd, xv and future synth models that Roland would make, and it also would end up in a direct derivative in the form of LA32 aka the MT32 and CM32L and D110 and so on. i think importantly though the help page is a guideline and not a hard rule book, i am thinking to revise it to make this more clear really but i hope this answers that at least MelonadeM (talk) 21:17, 15 July 2025 (UTC)